Sunday 13 November 2011

Anti- Kudankulam agitation -The lynch mob democracy‏


After committing over Rs 14,000 crores in investment to contribute over 9 Gigawatts of power to the national grid, the Kudankulam Nuclear Power Plant is in the limbo because a small minority of people perceive it to be unsafe against immense arrangements made for its safety.  Science, technology, polity, social justice and distribution of resources to rightful populace is all a package that does not now weigh up to even half of the weight of an odd number of people's perception.   The media, NGOs and social activists have directly or implicitly supported the 'perception' lobby through their activities or expressed views.  Reason has been slaughtered by surmises.  National plans are being massacred by irrational conspiracies.  It is an understatement to say that our future is at stake.

Let us widen this debate a little farther.

If we are to build a dam to distribute water to arid lands, irrigate drought-prone regions, provide drinking water to parched throats - the 'perception' lobby springs up a line of impediments.  Sardar Sarovar Project is a glaring example where thousands of crores of rupees of project escalation was one impact while the fear psychosis created by the anti-development mafia was a higher impact.  If we are to build some excellent road infrastructure, the 'perception' lobby raises the bogey of land acquisition and diverts national attention.  We can find examples for this in every state in the country.  If we are to put up nuclear power station, thermal power station, an assembly line to produce cars or any large project that could take forward the nation, it is certain that some lobby raises its cobra head and lunges forward to sting.  Media picks up the thread as negativism is always sensational.  The NGOs pick up the matter as most of them have assumed the position of 'principal opposition' to governance.  Both the proposition of law and opposition to policies have now become street activities and the Parliament or mechanisms of governance have become redundant, toothless and irrelevant.  Added to this is the senility of Government - both in age, actions and inactions.

It is a paradox that India has begun to use democracy to destroy itself.  Right to Information is misused, right to protest is misused, right to report is misused, right to govern is misused and the power invested in different institutions of democratic governance, whether they are governmental or non-governmental - are all misused, subverted and ridiculously applied.  As a result, the country has come to standstill.  Progress has been pared.  Future has been compromised.

We cannot continue like this forever.  It is a paradox that we are the third largest economy in the world but our infrastructure quality has been rated to be lower to that of Ivory Coast.  We need some sense of purpose in national life to build a common future.  And the lynching mob needs to be rightly guided and governed.  Otherwise, the status of 'most favoured nation' bestowed on us by Pakistan will come to mean that they like us because we are on the same slope of collapse like them and holding hands with them makes sense.  

V K Saxena 
President
 National Council for Civil Liberties 

Sunday 2 October 2011

Earthquake in Sikkim :The PHOENIX opportunities of life

 The Phoenix. What a spectacular life-form this bird example is!.  It lives for a thousand years and then the cruel act of fate burns it, its nest and every trace that it ever lived.  And then from those ashes of depredation - a new life form is born to flourish for another thousand years.

Although it is a paradox that re-creation has to stand on the rubble of devastation, it is a true fact of life.  Every natural calamity - be it a tsunami, volcanic eruption, cyclone or earth-quake, brings in a similar destruction around us.  And upon that tragic circumstance stands a social responsibility and an opportunity of resurgence.

Linking this thought to Bhuj in Gujarat is something I often do.  Ten years ago when Bhuj was razed to the ground by an abominable earth quake, we saw that thousands of people lost their life and hundreds of thousands lost livelihoods.  The city crumbled under the mud and pyres  burned for days.  The sights were so ghastly that no one ever thought that Bhuj will ever stand up again under the sun and its people would breathe a life of reconstructed hope.  But just  three years of hard-work, hope, support and good governance by Gujarat Govt, Bhuj is now a modern city of convenience and comfort to its people.  It is a lesson to all of us that any destruction, however tragic it may be, is a phoenix opportunity of rebirth, re-establishment and resilience.

Sikkim is now our unfortunate fate but is nothing short of a phoenix opportunity.  The beauty of life in this picturesque State has been delivered an unfair fate by the beast of nature.  The recent earth quake in Sikkim has reminded us of what Bhuj was a decade ago.  The mounds of mud and the burning pyres of Sikkim are still telling us of the tragedy of the recent earth quake and reminding us of the unforgotten sights of Bhuj.  While our hearts are yearning for resurgence of Sikkim, it is heartening to see that the Prime Minister has offered a thousand crore rupees for the purpose of reconstruction.  But, in the existing state of political confusion in the country,it is quite possible that this largesse is diverted and misused.  What we need now is a strong commitment, good governance, transparency of expenditure and a genuine effort like the Govt of Gujarat to rebuild the Sikkim  from its phoenix fate.

Since it has been shown to be possible once, it should be possible now to turn the phoenix fate of Sikkim to phoenix opportunity of rebirth and flourish.  

V K Saxena 

President
 National Council for Civil Liberties 

Thursday 25 August 2011

Twinkle of the twilight years of service --An advise to ANNA.

 
 When the bell of time rings anywhere between 55 and 60, the senior bureaucrats, judges and officers of any prominence in public service, rise to the call and fall in line.  It is the time of retirement blues.  Soon in a couple of years, they will be out of job.  Those cars with the privileged roof lights would soon stop ferrying them.  The minions and chaperones would turn away their face and begin to serve their new masters. . The free flights, phones, cars and the whole heaven of fully paid-up life would soon grind to halt.  So will the grand opportunity of wielding power, influencing files, collecting graft and living a life of unlimited luxury at the cost the poor countrymen.
With such an abominable prospect of retirement, the sword of Damocles, hanging over the head of those in high office, they soften.  They will work to please the political masters, so that a Governorship, ambassadorial assignment, Chairmanship of some Commission, deputation to UN/World Bank/IMF or some such plum posting is bestowed to them on retirement.  They will do everything possible to please their political bosses, be it fixing a judgement, allotting a contract or taking a favourable decision, so that the post-retirement plum does not evade them.

This possibility of acquiring favour in the post-retirement phase is the twinkle of the twilight years of service.  This is  one of the root causes of corruption in public life.  This possibility of reward for being the 'old faithful' - not only corrupts the senior public servants  and judges but also burdens us with senile Governors, Ambassadors and other high functionaries, not to speak of even the Presidents of the country. Hence there must be an age limit of 70 years for one and all  i.e  for bureaucrats and judges  after retirement and even  the for polititians to hold public office.  After the age of 70 years, no one should be allowed to hold any public office. There is already a provision that no government servant  can join private company for 2 years after retirement, but it lacks appropriate implementation.  It is now pertinent that the 2 year bench-sitting is strictly implemented to weed out corruption.

Anna's advisors and the Civil Society should include the provision of age limit avoiding this deep rooted evil  , when they finalize the Jan Lokpal Bill in the Parliament.  This can be avoided by placing a total moratorium  of atleast 2 years on post retirement re-employment to high positions .  Another way is to place a time-bar on re-employment, so that those over 70  years of age are given an honourable retirement exit from public life

  A revolution normally breaks the knees of establishment and brings it down to the ground.  But it is only the just legislation and a fair opportunity of wise advise that makes the vehicle of Governance move again on its wheels.  Therefore, it is important that the best alternatives and just provisions are incorporated into the legislation in the making.

V K Saxena
President
 National Council for Civil Liberties  
Ahmedabad - 380 009 
web: www.ncclindia.org
e-mail: nccl27@hotmail.com

Monday 22 August 2011

Nationwide outrage on corruption



Desh mein andhera hai, chirag ek jala do
Sote hue Bharat ko utho phir se utha do
Is mulk ki mitti se jisse hai nai ragbat (pyaar)
Us shaks ki hasti hi is zamane se mita do.
Karta hai tafarke (desh-drohita) ki agar baat koi toh
Ta umra rahe yaad zuban uski jala do.
                   By Justice Tej Shankar (Retd.)   


VK Saxena
President
National Council for Civil Liberties(NCCL)
Ahmedabad



Sunday 31 July 2011

Bhopal: Dead have their eyes open and the living have their eyes closed


An extremely disturbing photograph, showing the face of a child half buried after the Bhopal tragedy of 1984, is so effective because the dead child has its eyes open. 
The years 2009 , 2010 and 2011 in India have thrown up the macabre spectacle of systemic failure of not just our justice system, but our administrative complacency, political negligence and an overall state of societal dysfunction.  We have failed ourselves and nobody else.  We have proven that we only ask questions, but never answer.   
Towards the end of 2009, we realized that the Liberhan Commission took 19 years to complete its investigation on a matter that very closely represents the duality of our social fabric.  Close on its heels came the revelation that it took over 19 years for a young girl’s molester to be booked under our criminal justice system.  And we now have the first rung of justice delivered for one of the largest tragedies of our times(Bhopal Gas), after 25 years of its happening.  While the debate on the adequacy of the result of these investigations or delivery of justice is yet another matter to review, what is appalling is that as a nation, we just do not have any sense of time,  any sense of empathy for the aggrieved or any semblance of civilized outlook on human values that should normally address the suffering of fellow countrymen.
It is also very disheartening that we are witnessing the denigration of contemporary political leaders.  It was at first shocking to see that  N.D. Tiwari walking into disgrace.  Now we see the rank and file of political leadership including . Arjun Singh,  Zail Singh, PV Narasimha Rao and even  Rajiv Gandhi being mentioned as those who are part of the national shame of bestowing honour to the exit of the prime accused of Bhopal tragedy, from India.  
 We have seen how  Barrack Obama has repeated that the buck stops with him and he is responsible for solving the unfolding tragedy in the Gulf of Mexico.  On the other side of the globe in India, we are seeing how in the system, we do not see anyone who would stand up and own the responsibility.  We are witnessing a phenomenon in the nation where the political leadership tries to see itself above ‘accountability’, judiciary asserts that its role is limited, the media lives in the glory of ‘hindsight’ and the society just does not care.
The 9/11 investigations took one year to complete.  World War II investigations reached decision in two years.  The Hiroshima atomic bomb investigations were brought before the world in eleven months.  More than all, those who suffered in all these enormous tragedies began rebuilding their lives with the help of society, media, administration and political leadership within a span of two years.
We have reduced this nation to such a moral low that the dead have their eyes open and the living have their eyes closed.
V K Saxena
 President
 National Council for Civil Liberties ,
 Navrangpura, 
Ahmedabad - 380 009 Phone www.ncclindia.org e-mail: nccl27@hotmail.com

Wednesday 13 July 2011

Teesta Setalvad - a river of collution



The name 'Teesta' invokes in me the pristine images of the river that springs out of the Himalayan splendour, flowing down the valleys of green purity and merging into the same expanse of water into which the holiest of our rivers debouch.  As I close my eyes in its remembrance, a calm serenity invades me.  That is 'Teesta' for me - a sublime flow of truth, which is unpolluted and 'un-colluded'.

But when I leave behind the rawness of nature and return to the harness of urban India, 'Teesta' is a different river for me.  It springs out Himalayan blunders, flows down the alleys of collusion and debouches into a ghastly pool of conspiratorial social space.  As I close my eyes in its remembrance, a violent shock pervades me.  That is 'Teesta' for you - a ruthless mix of untruth, polluted and colluded.

The origins lie in the now famous Best Bakery case following the ghastly tragedy of Godhra in 2002.  Teesta Setalvad, the more than active social activist of Citizens for Justice and Peace, a Mumbai based NGO spearheaded a movement on the post-Godhra riots and set the nation transfixed to the Best Bakery case with its prime witness Zahira Sheikh.  If there is any episode that collected more or equal TRP ratings on the Television other than 'Kyunki Saas Bhi Kabhi Bahu Thi' in the modern times in India, it is the documentaries on the 'Best Bakery case'.  Thanks to Teesta for building a huge hype around this case and raising Zahira from her own personal tragedies to the national scene of expectation and anticipation.  But it is only when Justice Pasayat , Supreme Court severely reprimanded Zahira in 2006 and declared that "this is a classic example of a case where evidences were tampered with and witnesses won over, did the colours of Teesta begin to show up.  Zahira was sentenced to an year of imprisonment for the contempt of court, but Teesta remained a free flow - however much mudslides it gathered.  However, Zahira  urged the Hon'ble Court to probe the assets of Teesta  as she had forced her to give 'wrong testimony'.

Did this account confuse you?  The story does not end at that and is not as simple as such.  It raises far too many questions than it answers.  Why did Zahira Sheikh revolt against her benefactor, how did Teesta Setalvad manage to build an army of witnesses, what resources sustained the case, what were the broad political underlines for the case and why do people prepare webs of falsehood to create perceptions that appear to be truth in the initial stages?

Mr. Hiren Jhaveri of Ahmedabad began asking some of these questions and came up with startling answers.  

Mr. Jhaveri found out that Teesta  paid a total of Rs. 12 lakhs to 14 persons who were witnesses in the 2002 riot cases.  Ten of these people received Rs. 1 lakh each while four of the rest received Rs. 50,000 each.  They were all in the form of Demand Drafts (Nos. 567540 to 567554 dated 01.08.2007),issued by Punjab and Sindh Bank , Gol Market Branch, New Delhi .  In return, the recipients returned a signed receipt, thanking Teesta  for help.
But in spite of all these, if all cats have not come out of the bag yet, it is because of the ingenious ways in which Teesta colludes and flows through the valleys of social conspiracies.

All these witnesses come from poor economic background and the money paid to them is no doubt a small fortune in their empty hands.  In a nation of empty hands and hungry bellies, you don't need a river of strength to erode the honesty and subvert the loyalty.  Teesta was too strong a current to oppose for these men and women and they were carried away by the lure.  But alas! The firm banks of the Court of Supreme Justice could not be eroded or breached.
.
Yes.  Many tributaries colluded with Teesta to flow in unison on the plains of dishonesty and vested political interest.  Teesta's main course was to erode the prosperous banks of Gujarat, undermine the rock stability of its governance and subvert the minds of millions of Indians on the horizon of modern India.  The river of collution is a brazen expression of enormous power of vested interests, their reach, ramifications and endless energy to erode civility and civic liberty.  The river of collution has no hesitation to flood the corridors of justice and public life.

Teesta - the river of collution is a serpentine strength of undeterred underflow in public life.
  


V,K. Saxena
President
 National Council for Civil Liberties ,
Ahmedabad - 380 009 
web: www.ncclindia.org

Friday 8 July 2011

Kashmir: Spineless leadership and endless problems

Written on 1/10/2010


A temporary truce has been bargained, bartered, bought and begun in Kashmir.  

But in which Kashmir?  In the so called 'Indian Occupied Kashmir' - that is how the world recognizes this part.  That is the crux of Indian tragedy and national failure.  It is only our Kashmir that is recognized as disputed territory.  The Pakistan Occupied Kashmir (POK) is seldom drawn into territorial dispute.  The China Occupied Kashmir (COK) - Aksai Chin is never questioned about its ownership.  Our weak leadership, lack of foresight, fractured political wisdom and diplomatic indecisiveness have made the world bolder to the concept of 'dispute' on Kashmir.  And they all just mean the portion on which we have territorial command.

It is a diplomatic disaster that the UN Secretary General called our Kashmir a disputed territory last week.  This has ruffled the feathers of those who want to fly the 'plebiscite' kite.  Our representatives in the UN should have corrected the phrase 'disputed' to 'disturbed'.  But we have a clerical Government that has neither political strength nor the sense of perspective national responsibility.

Pakistan has recently spoken about the similarity of Kashmir to Palestine and has elevated the Kashmir tangle to the historic proportion of the Middle East. This is a new angle of diplomatic mischief, prompted solely by our inaction and irresponsibility.  It is high time that we dropped our defensive tenor about Kashmir and claimed both POK and COK as disputed - an act somewhat half-heartedly attempted by Mr. Atal Behari Vajpayee.  

The basic question that should rock the parliament is whether we should defend Kashmir by continuing to repulse Pakistani assertions OR whether we should aggressively go on offensive to thwart external aggressions, develop infrastructure, promote settlements in the manner the Israelis guard their precious lands and wage a focused war on Pakistan's dominance on Kashmir issue.  It is high time that we took up the second option.  Instead, we are talking to the parties in Kashmir that want to further fracture this piece of land, giving them an impression that we recognize the status of 'dispute'.  

It is also essential that Kashmir consciousness is spread amongst Indians the way it is spread by the Pakistani leadership amongst its citizens.  Every Pakistani cares for and revers Kashmir the way the their religious edicts are dignified.  Whereas, Kashmir consciousness is weak in Indian minds and is a remote and vague issue for a majority of our populace.  Pakistan as a nation can be aroused on the word 'Kashmir'.  But large parts of India cannot make sense of it as it has not been elevated as an issue of national integrity or psyche by the political leadership.  

In all, bringing peace within Kashmir, flushing terrorists off the lands, developing infrastructure, promoting aggressive settlements and restoring law and order are one part of the game.  What's more important is to establish a feeling in the world that we are enraged by attempts to belittle the national integrity and want to fiercely defend our interests and rights.  If a limited war is to be waged on this account, India should do so in the way any nationalist government will do in any country.  


V K Saxena 
President 
National Council for Civil Liberties 
 Ahmedabad -

Wednesday 22 June 2011

Binayak: he must be given bail now . Why ?‏


Written on  14 May 2009


 To The Editor
 Indian Express




 Your edit ‘Two years on’(May 14) on Binayak Sen smacks of undue pressure on the Supreme Court when you say “he must be given bail now.” Has the Express crossed the Laxman rekha in disregarding the due process of law when Sen has been charged with serious offences? Is this not a direct interference by a newspaper in the administration of justice? 
 It must be remembered that Sen was arrested under the Chattisgarh Special Public Security Act, and the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, . He has been accused of passing letters from the Maoist leader to operatives outside the jail, possession of materials that show allegiance to the outlawed group and helping rent an apartment for some of its members. These are indeed quite serious charges. Why then should a newspaper of your stature seem to put undue pressure on the judiciary by such editorials. Whether bail to Sen or not is left to the honourable judges to decide. The hearing should logically culminate into a verdict. This is what the law-abiding citizens of this nation expect from courts.
  Sen is no common undertrial – there are cases of undertrial languishing in jails for 14 years and above – and Sen has just been in jail for two years. You seem to be carried away by the character certificate of 22 Nobel laureates, a host of Indian MPs on which youpresume Sen not guilty and if this becomes a norm every culprit will bring in character certificates to influence the judiciary. This is strange coming as it does from a newspaper of your repute. Sen’s bail petition is coming for hearing this Friday. What was the need to> champion Sen’s cause with such undue haste?
 It is well known that Naxals have killed thousands of innocent policemen and civilians through brutal warfare. They are enemies of the state. Strangely you admit in your editorial that Sen’s supporters are accusing the Chattisgarh government of resorting to draconian methods. This itself proves that Sen and his supporters are sympathizers of Naxal movements. Yet, for some mysterious reason you agree with their viewpoint thereby casting aspersions on the government’s unrelenting fight against the Naxals. 
 Media trial in this country has become a Roman circus. But this is probably the first case where a newspaper has moved beyond reason to direct the Supreme Court “he must be given bail now.”  Is it not a calculated attempt by some leading TV channels and newspapers airing favourable stories/editorials against powerful law-breakers exactly two or three days before the case is slated for hearing. It was never ever expected from a newspaper of your repute.

V K Saxena
President
National Council for Civil Liberties 

Binayak Sen : Judgement on judgement by Media.


Written on 31-12-2010

 Posted on Blog 22-6-2010

Raipur court in a landmark judgement sentenced Binayak Sen for life term for his association with Naxals, which has ended once for all, all speculation of his innocence, as projected by some self-proclaimed human right activists & selected media group.

 Article of Mr. Pravin Mishra "Captivation the conscience" Ahmedabad Mirror (31-12-2010)is based on his sentiments. Projecting Sen as nation's conscience is highly objectionable. It seems Pravin has not gone through the judgement of and wrote this article without knowing that courts go by evidence not by sentiments.   

It must be remembered that Sen was arrested for seditious activities such as passing letters from the Maoist leader to operatives outside the jail, possession of materials that show allegiance to the outlawed group, helping rent an apartment for some of its members & helping in opening bank accounts. Above all, Sen met Sanyal, a well-known Naxalite, 32 times in jail in 2months i.e. alomost every alternate day either as his relative or as a friend. This fact has not been denied by Sen himself. Leaving apart all other charges, this act alone proves that Sen was deep into Naxalism & was working as a conduit under the garb of social activists. Still media was putting undue pressure on the judiciary through favorable editorials before the verdict.


It is well known that Naxals are enemies of the state involved in killing thousands of innocent policemen and civilians. Still Sen was projected, for some mysterious reason, a great human right activists, thereby casting aspersions on the judiciary by calling the judgement erroneous & or lacking judicial conviction. 

This is for the first time a powerful law-breaker has been punished, I am sure in future many more such sympathizers of Naxals will face the trial.


V K Saxena 
President
National Council for Civil Liberties

Monday 13 June 2011

These can happen only in India

Released in November 2010. 

Media getting judgemental on Binayak Sen.


Written on 12Jan.2011 

Posted on Blog on 13June2011

Pritish Nandy's article "Lets not use the S word" (AT 12th January)is based on his suspicion that BJP govt. in Chattisgardh directed Raipur court to prosecute Binayak Sen as if the courts of Chattisgardh are working directly under it. Nandy is a well-known journalist with sound legal knowledge. He should know that Raipur court in a landmark judgement sentenced Binayak Sen for life term for his association with Naxals, which has ended once for all, all speculation of his innocence, as projected by some self-proclaimed human right activists & selected media group.

   

It must be remembered that Sen was arrested for seditious activities such as passing letters from the Maoist leader to operatives outside the jail, helping rent an apartment for some of its members & helping in opening bank accounts. Above all, Sen met Sanyal, a well-known Naxalite, 32 times in jail in 2 months i.e. alomost every alternate day. These facts are on record & have not been denied by Sen himself during cross examination. Leaving apart all other charges, this act alone i.e. Sen met Sanyal 32 times ,proves that Sen was deep into Naxalism & was working as a conduit under the garb of social activists. Nandy forgot that once even Supreme court denied him bail.


When Maoist blew up a bus in Dantiwada, killing 50 people, Law Minister Veerappa Moily said "unrealistic judicial activism is one of the main reason for increased naxalism in the country".Still media is putting undue pressure on the judiciary through favorable editorials. He cannot get away lightly on account of being a doctor or a human right activists.Sen was no uncommon under trial when few journalists seems to be carried away by the character certificate of few noble laureates, a host of Indian MP's on which they presumed Sen not guilty.

 

Naxal scourge has spread and afflicts seven states on Indian union. The enemy today that threatens our unity and integrity is within our midst. A challenge like the one from Naxals from outside the country could have been taken head-on. However, given the reach and spread of human rights activists in scuttling concrete action against the menace, the time has now come to show a determined face so that Naxals/maoist do not stage another one of their gory depredation.Maoist/Naxals have challenged the sovereignty of the country, thanks to the overt and covert support from so called human rights activists.

 

Naxals are enemies of the state involved in killing thousands of innocent policemen and civilians. Still Sen was projected, for some mysterious reason, a great human right activists, thereby casting aspersions on the judiciary. Let us hope the higher judiciary will not take a note of a relentless media criticism of the judgement.   

Most of the activists rise to fame have been through fake struggles & media management. After this judgement these so called social workers, who made the most in exploiting sentiments of poor & illiterate in the past, are now running for cover.

This is for the first time a powerful law-breaker has been punished, I am sure in future many more such sympathizers of Naxals will face the trial and columnist like Nandy will refrain from projecting a convict as a great social activist.   


V K Saxena 
President
 National Council for Civil Liberties
401 Vraj Avenue, C - 2 Swastik Society,Navrangpura, Ahmedabad - 380 009
Phone +91-79-26560979, Fax +91-79-26401892 
web: www.ncclindia.org e-mail: nccl27@hotmail.comex

Tuesday 7 June 2011

Terrorism - Butts of abominable terror and Bhatts in unpardonable error




                                                            Date:  07/06/2011

Shri. A.P. Singh
Director,
Central Bureau of Investiagetion. (CBI)
Lodhi complex.
New Delhi.


Question 1: Does the behaviour of Mahesh & Rahul Bhatts directly and indirectly help Pakistan based terror to spread in India?
Question 2: Are the famous Mahesh & Rahul Bhatts easy conduits for conspirators and terror planners?

Dear Mr. Singh’;

In the Headlines Today TV debate on May 24 renowned Indian filmmaker Mahesh Bhatt was asked whether the Pakistani spy agency Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) should be declared a terror organization following David Coleman Headley's startling revelation in a Chicago court that ISI had provided support to terror group Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) in carrying out the deadly 2008 Mumbai terror attack. Surprisingly Bhatt’s answer was a convoluted one which in essence meant that nothing should be done to ISI and should be given a chance . He refrained from giving a categorical answer to so obvious a question.

The evidence against ISI has been piling up rapidly and the world knows how dangerous the ISI has become. Yet a usually garrulous Bhatt refused to be drawn into giving a straight answer despite the fact that Headley had met even his son Rahul Bhatt while he was in Mumbai on a recce and Rahul is said to have hobnobbed with him freely. Rahul’s cell no was found in Headly’s hand written private diary in which nos of others important terrorist & ISI officials were mentioned. 

Despite the father being evasive and seemingly going against the country’s interest in his open love for Pakistan, Rahul Bhatt in a statement published in Times of India, Ahmedabad on 26th May, said, "The son has to pay for his father's crime. That's the cost of being the son of Mahesh Bhatt, who is pro-Pakistan and has been promoting that country”. 

What does Rahul mean by “his father’s crime?” The people of India must be taken into confidence and all links of Mahesh Bhatt needs to be probed thoroughly even whether he is working as an agent of Pakistan. His love for Pakistan has now become a legend and he has been blatantly promoting Pakistan artistes in India and one of them - Rahat Fateh Ali Khan was held at Delhi airport on February 13 for carrying undeclared amount of foreign currency. The ramifications are many and it is the duty of the CBI to probe the leads without any political hindrance.

It is insensitive and sinister of Rahul to say that Headley made him famous. "I became infamous first and famous later because of him. Today, if I am considered a celebrity fitness instructor, it is because of that case.'' Even after this damaging statement why is the CBI not taking up the inquiry suo moto?

In Rahat case too, Mahesh Bhatt was hooting for cultural exchanges with Pakistan to continue in the “larger interest of the people of the entire region.” To what purpose when Pakistan wants India dead?  For reasons known to him, Bhatt has been promoting maximum Pakistani artistes in india and his relationship with Pakistanis is not something innocuous but goes beyond the call of film industry which requires a probe to rule out the chance that he is not acting as an enemy within? Or could he be working under the garb of Indian film industry as an agent of ISI?

Even Salman Rushdie after the Abbottabad incident when bin Laden was killed by the Americans said that Pakistan should be declared as a terror state. Then why is Mahesh Bhatt hiding behind false niceties? If anything, he seems to be more communal than anyone if his activities are anything to go by.

On 27 May 2011, Hindustan Times and other newspapers reported that Headley had cautioned Rahul Bhatt not to go to South Mumbai on 26/11.  Why would he do that, if it was not to protect a friend?  Headley has even said during enquiries that he had planned to take Rahul Bhatt to the tribal areas of Pakistan and recruit him as an agent of ISI in India.  All these means that the bonhomie was thick and Rahul had vibed well for the initial angling of Headley in that direction.  It is also possible that he had discussed these things with his father Mahesh Bhatt and had his moral support as the senior Bhatt has the distinction of being very sympathetic to the cause of Pakistan.

The nation has witnessed in the recent past that it has become an unfailing practice with celebrities caught in the act of illegal actions to dismiss the issue as one of the harassment by the Government & authorities. We have also seen enough of the brazen ways of the celebrities in collecting support to themselves amongst their ilk in order to pressurize, stun and numb the democratic course of law. Errant cricketers, film artists and cultural ambassadors have all trodden this path by which they attempt to overwhelm the process of justice with their fame, name, riches & public aura. If this were to be in the USA, Bhatts would have been under custody by now, answering tough questions on their thoughts and roles in directly or indirectly promoting terrorist actions.  

In matters as sensitive as these, the celebrities have to show caution in their words and actions.  But due to the blatant failure of caution from their side, the agents of ISI and divisive forces from Pakistan have taken advantage under their celebrity shadow. 

I appeal to you to kindly see this issue in its proper prospective. I appeal to you to strengthen the moral standing of the people in the enforcement agencies & to come down heavily on those who indulge themselves in unpatriotic chauvinism. I also appeal to you through this letter/notice to recognize the seriousness of this matter & investigate the whole issue in the larger national interest to unearth the conspiracy, if any.  

Your goodself will agree that Bhatts owe an answer to the nation through CBI or under a PIL that could be filed in the Supreme Court, if, no tangible action is taken to unmask these people.

V K Saxena 
President
 National Council for Civil Liberties 
Ahmedabad - 380 009 
web: www.ncclindia.org
e-mail: nccl27@hotmail.com
BLOG: vksaxena-nationfirst.blogspot.com
     

Wednesday 1 June 2011

ANNA YE TUNE KYA KIYA ??




Written on 11/04/2011

                     The 1.21 billion people nation felt united like in the days of Gandhi ji when Anna went 'ann na' at the spooky named Jantar Mantar in the capital, demanding for a legislative bill against corruption.  The nation handed over the hardest soft power to the frail Gandhian and believed that he will root out corruption which is deep-rooted in our society.  Little did anyone know that in five days, one of the biggest movements of modern India will meekly wind up with the formation of a committee that has two innocuous sides - one side that is enslaved to dynastic rule and the other side that has an in-built dynastic dimension. The Government side is headed by a wily politician who specializes is laying winding paths like 'jalebis' even for simple straightforward destinations and amongst the members are the Home Minister and Law Minister,  The Non-Governmental side is comprised of a dynasty of father and son and Anna himself in addition to others. For all the 1.21 billion people, it is shame that we cannot look beyond dynasties, families and spineless faithful even when we have to draft an epoch-making law to thwart corruption.  I am sure this will wash off as yet another hyped affair.  And those who had taken a brief break from demanding bribes will have already begun their work with an inflated price.

                      While most members of the Committee look either senile or clueless or complacent or harmless at the outset, Prashant Bhushan is the epicenter of concerns, because he is the one who is not senile or clueless or complacent or harmless. He is facing 'contempt of court' and is not discharged from the Apex Court on the matter, as yet.  His ideologies are vastly sympathetic to Maoists and has visibly shared platforms with the likes of Medha Patkar who has advocated the cause of Naxal movement & is known anti-development in India

                     The father-son dynastic duo on this anti-corruption committee is the anti-climactic tragi-comedy of Anna's making.  If there is such a thing called the 'call of the conscience, Prashanth Bhushan should step down from the responsibility.  Social causes are not family causes and social affairs not family affairs.  If at the end of this grandly orchestrated national task emerges 'anarchy' and constitutional impropriety, the laughing hyenas of the corrupt corridors of Governance will bleed us all.  If we cannot escape from dynasties, we are sure to 'die nasty'.

V K Saxena 
President 
National Council for Civil Liberties 


NCCL welcomes S.C. order on NBA‏

Written on 17/05/2011.


It is often said better late than never and therefore it comes as no surprise that the Supreme Court should speak the truth about Medha Patekar led Narmada Bachao Andolan for misleading the judiciary on the issue of land acquisition for Omkareshwar dam Project in Madhya Pradesh (PTI report, May 12, 2011). The apex court has gone one step further in asking all courts across the country to be cautious in examining NBA petitions. "It is desirable that in future, the courts must view any presentation by the NBA with caution and care and in case it has any doubt, refuse to entertain the NBA," the apex court has said. 
The National Council for Civil Liberties (NCCL) has been saying this right from the beginning that NBA is a fake organization and has been exposing it for the past 11 years pointing out that the NBA and Medha Patkar have been foreign friendly, foreign supported, and inimical to the progress of state and the country. NCCL’s struggle had begun in right earnest when it took up cudgels on behalf of Gujarat’s lifeline, the Narmada dam, as it was subjected to intense attack from Medha’s illogical crusade. Under the smokescreen of providing just compensation to the tribals, Medha was getting vicarious pleasure of seeing Gujarat’s lifeline coming close to being aborted so that the state slides back to perpetual backwardness and poverty. Her action was against established norms of civil decency as she was clearly involved  and with many political groups preferring to turn a blind eye to her shenanigans  in activities contrary to our national interests. This was what the NCCL had been saying from Day One that these NGOs, flush with foreign funds, are hell-bent upon bringing disrepute to this nation by harming the progress of Gujarat.
In the backdrop of the apex court observation it would be proper for Gujarat Government orders an inquiry into the veracity of all affidavits filed so far by NBA in the Supreme Court and lower courts against the SSP. The sooner this is done the better it would be as anti-national activities by many a NGO still continue to thrive. Gujarat was subjected to ridicule that had a bearing on its economic progress by charges of partnership flung by these NGO’s like NBA of Medha.
NCCL has fought through social, technical, legal and non-violent means to oppose & expose Patkar’s tirade & I am deeply happy that the S.C. after a thorough investigation has brought to light the truth about NBA which NCCL was telling from the last several years. I feel this important judgment will go a long way to curb the anti-development activities of many such NGO’s.

V K SAXENA
PRESIDENT
National Council for Civil Liberties,

Monday 30 May 2011

Has Anna seen through Medha's game?

2/05/11

Has Anna seen through Medha's game?
The CD purportedly released by Amar Singh has raised many questions than it has answered vis-à-vis Shanti Bhushan and son Prashant the former being the Lokpal Bill drafting committee co-chair. 
What has confounded everyone is that a government lab had authenticated the conversation between  Shanti Bhushan and Samajwadi Party chief Mulayam Singh Yadav and then party general secretary Amar Singh over the junior Bhushan allegedly influencing a judge.
 For those who are worried about the sanctity of the panel comprising members of the civil society, the real question is was Anna Hazare railroaded into accepting the father son duo through an emotional blackmail as Anna himself had admitted that he knew nothing of the Bhusans until they were co-opted in the panel?
 Though both the Bhushans have categorically denied any wrongdoing, the CD controversy has become murkier after the government lab’s categorical statement. What is raising the eyebrows is that Medha Patkar role in the whole affair.
 Medha was visible on dais sitting close to Anna at Jantar Mantar upto 4th april . Her actions seemed that she knew Anna well and she would be there to stay as long he continued fasting. However the day Supreme Court issued notice of perjury against her in Maheshwar project case i.e on 5th April, Medha had to run for the hills after it was clear that she had filed a false affidavit in the Supreme Court. Medha & Bhushan have had over 20 year relationship and Prashant Bhushan has been appearing for Medha not only in Supreme Court & High Courts but even in the Metropolitan Court. Today Medha has lost her credibility, her name and fame thanks to Supreme Court coming heavily down upon her. In a high-pitched campaign like Anna’s fight against corruption she is obviously a persona non grata. Has she cleverly then pushed the Bhushans forward by foisting her wily charms on an innocent Anna so as to make father son duo part of the Lokpal drafting committee?
Interestingly the NGO of Shanti & Prashant Bhushan had blamed several judges in the past for getting land from discretionary quota of govnment at cheaper rates, while Bhushans themselves are involved in the similar game. This could spell trouble in civil society’s fight against corruption which Anna is spearheading.

V K SAXENA
PRESIDENT
National Council for Civil Liberties,
401 Vraj Avenue, C-2 Swastik Society,
Navrangpura, Ahmedabad - 380 009
Gujarat, India.
Phone No. +91 - 79 -26560979, Fax No. +91 - 79 - 26401892
Web: www.ncclindia.org, E-mail: nccl27@hotmail.com

Sunday 29 May 2011

Terrorism: Strange Action of a Senile Nation

22-05-2011


When terrorism became a curse of history, Osama Bin Laden turned into its infamous Fakir. He refined its forms, contemplated with due diligence and threw upon his enemies with great perfection.  And when he threw the curse, it stuck well and wrought havoc.  That killed people in hordes and brought shivers to the knees of mighty nations.  He established the largest underworld of terror governance and threw curses across the continents with high and unparalleled sophistication.  When he was incapacitated, albeit some questions of peripheral legality, no one raised a finger of disapproval.  Because, humanity wanted terrorism restrained, reduced, removed and erased.  And those who dared to risk their lives on the mission to kill the master of terrorism were rewarded and revered. 

I often wonder whether India is as resolute and responsible in thwarting the curse of terrorism! 
Take for example the terrorist and extortionist Sohrabuddin who was wanted in three states or Ishrat Jahan who, as per Central Intelligence bureau inputs, entered Gujarat with Pakistani nationals to kill the Chief Minister Modi.  When they were felled by Gujarat police, instead of celebrating the significant dent made on terrorism in India, a political party pursued Muslim appeasement policy by way of encouraging Teesta Setalvad to move a petition saying that the encounters were fake.   Unlike the accolades and rewards poured on those who opposed terrorism in the world, the cops who dared to take the terrorism head-on in India lost their jobs and even a Home Minister was jailed.  Sending those who strive hard to keep law and order to prison makes the Fakirs who send down the curse of terrorism - stronger, confident, brazen and successful.  When the underworld of terrorism is allowed to rise above ground, the over-world of law and security becomes terrorized and invalid.  With this, the Government supported NGOs like those of Teesta Setalvad become far more powerful .

The Central Government has an uncanny knack of chasing the wrong goose and killing the guardians.  It allows those who waged Kargil war to be guest speakers in New Delhi.  It goes overboard to shake hands with a Government that has planned and bred terrorism on its soil with a sole purpose of striking us in Kashmir and Mumbai.  The senility of top leadership in Governance has no vision of right against wrong.  

If Pakistan is a rogue State that breeds and broadcasts terrorism, we are a senile State that tolerate terrorism and wrongly punish those who oppose it.  If USA considers the killing of a terrorist an act of war that’s beyond the considerations of sovereignty of another nation, India considers the killing of a terrorist as an act that displeases a particular community.  If USA rewards and celebrates its heroes who decimate terrorists, India unseats and jails those who try to nip terrorism in the bud. If USA feels that the attack on WTC is violation of their sovereignty and then justifies killing even the unarmed perpetrator of violence on the soil of another country, India spends millions in keeping Afzal Guru safe and alive despite the Supreme Court order of capital punishment to the dreaded attacker of the Parliament. 

In fact, the way the Government of India addresses terrorism is in itself terrorising. In the recent goof-up of dossier sent to Pakistan asking to hand over 50 terrorists, a few have been traced to India.  The Government does not know who it is searching for & who it has found. The icing on the cake is the appointment of Binayak Sen to a Committee of the Planning Commission, a convict of no less a charge than sedition. 

At a time when we have to move forward with head held high, we have begun to move backwards on sly.  

My own country is beginning to appear strange to me.  


V K Saxena 
President 
National Council for Civil Liberties 
401 Vraj Avenue, C - 2 Swastik Society, 
Navrangpura, Ahmedabad - 380 009 Phone +91-79-26560979, Fax +91-79-26401892 
web: www.ncclindia.org e-mail: nccl27@hotmail.com